andreas | beccai

observations shared.

Talking about bicyles

“It is the work of true education. . . to train the youth to be thinkers, and not mere reflectors of other men’s thought.”

– Education, Chapter 1, page 17

These are the opening lines of the revealing article “It’s complicated” written by Luke Whiting in Spectrum magazine 3 weeks ago. Luke traces his life as an Adventist from a student in a small independent Adventist school, to a leader in GYC, to a pastoral position in the Michigan conference and finally to San Francisco working for a tech startup.

As I read Luke’s article it occurred to me that his story in many aspects was the story of many Adventist children. I also realised that his story could fit well within a framework that charts human interaction with ideals, animate and inanimate.

The framework is found in C. S. Lewis’s essay “Talking about Bicycles,” which was first published in Resistance in October, 1946, and later collected in Present Concerns.

Lewis begins the essay with an apparently mundane conversation:

“Talking about bicycles,” said my friend, “I have been through the

1) four ages. I can remember a time in early childhood when a bicycle meant nothing to me: it was just part of the huge meaningless background of grown-up gadgets against which life went on.

2) Then came a time when to have a bicycle, and to have learned to ride it, and to be at last spinning along on one’s own, early in the morning, under trees, in and out of the shadows, was like entering Paradise. That apparently effortless and frictionless gliding—more like swimming than any other motion, but really most like the discovery of a fifth element—that seemed to have solved the secret of life. Now one would begin to be happy.

3) But, of course, I soon reached the third period. Pedalling to and fro from school (it was one of those journeys that feel up-hill both ways) in all weathers, soon revealed the prose of cycling. The bicycle, itself, became to me what his oar is to a galley-slave.”

“But what was the fourth age?” I asked.

4) “I am in it now, or rather I am frequently in it. I have had to go back to cycling lately now that there’s no car. And the jobs I use it for are often dull enough. But again and again the mere fact of riding brings back a delicious whiff of memory. I recover the feelings of the second age. What’s more, I see how true they were—how philosophical, even. For it really is a remarkably pleasant motion. To be sure, it is not a recipe for happiness as I then thought. In that sense the second age was a mirage. But a mirage of something.”

“How do you mean?” said I.

“I mean this. Whether there is, or whether there is not, in this world or in any other, the kind of happiness which one’s first experiences of cycling seemed to promise, still, on any view, it is something to have had the idea of it. The value of the thing promised remains even if that particular promise was false—even if all possible promises of it are false.”

hillclimber-bikeLewis continues in his essay by labelling these experiences the “four ages.” He makes a compelling argument that they represent a more universal human experience. The four ages titled: Unenchantment, Enchantment, Disenchantment, and Re-enchantment

I applied this to Luke’s story, distilling what I thought was the essence of each stage and filling in obvious holes.

Unenchantment: As a child he was unenchanted, oblivious to the worldview that his parents espoused, he went to church but was not yet capable of making independent spiritual decisions.

Enhancement: As he grew up he was sent to a 40 student self-supporting institutions that did their best to follow the “blue print” – the master plan of education supposedly left to us by Ellen White. He would spend his time in bible memorisation and hymn singing, and he would preach evangelistic campaigns, knowing the 2300 day prophecy by heart. He went to southern as a nursing major and because of his work for GYC he was hired by the Michigan conference to pastor. He was living the dream.

Disenchantment: It was then that everything begun to unravel. All his ideas, his bible studies, his pad answers that had worked so well in casual meetings, began to face challenges as they came face to face with complex and broken people. He had a friend who turned his life around on a mountain and became a buddhist. He met loving people who worshiped on sunday, hard-bitten atheist who gave sacrificial to orphans and volunteered their time, a was spiritually fed by a tattooed female pastor. He soon started to wonder if he was the one confused and not them? He studied mountains of theology, but the questions kept ringing. Soon he felt that he could not in good conscience continue drawing a pay cheque from the his conference and he wrote his letter of resignation and was left paid ministry.

Re-enchantment: Luke concludes his article with this paragraph “It’s been a few years since that turbulent year in Michigan, and I’m still navigating the implications. My Facebook relationship status with the church would read “It’s complicated.” I’m learning to embrace the tension and am realising that the questions are often more important than the answers. Life is nothing if not a mystery and adventure.” – I don’t consider this re-enchantment but he is coming out of the valley of disenchantment, and charting an upward course.

Those who responded to the article in Spectrum I would classify  for the most part as being “disenchanted.” They gave Luke virtual fists bumps, and hailed him as being enlightened because the scales had dropped from eyes. They all but coronated Luke’s disenchantment, but few held out any hope of the possibility of re-enchantment with the church and the message that Luke once was enchanted with. For them enchantment was naive and immature. There were others who fought back, and labeled Luke a defector of our faith. They stood upon the hill-top of enchantment and cast stones at Luke for his weak faith and fragility in ministry.

I have friends who have experienced cycles in their spiritual life akin to Luke, I have trodden a path with similar vistas and because of that I believe that Lewis’s fourth age is a reality. Re-enchantment can happen for Adventist like Luke. We can choose to accept that we are part of an imperfect church filled with imperfect people who serve a perfect God with a glorious message. For sure, there are those who have been maimed by church politics, dragged over the coals for divergent (but non-essential) theological views. Yet, there are many noble people, and life changing organisations that exist, and in the fourth age we accept the reality that thorns are part of roses. In my fourth age renewal, I came to a deep conviction that the fulcrum of Adventist theology, namely, “God is Love” is true. If it is true then all bets are off. If I can trust the heart of God, then I can wrestle boldly with Him when I don’t understand his actions, or am wounded by his people.

Do you think that these four ages can be applied to other areas of life? Can we simultaneously experience different stages of these ages in areas of our life? Would love to hear your thoughts.

Advertisements

5 comments on “Talking about bicyles

  1. Kessia Reyne Bennett
    September 9, 2013

    Andreas: intriguing post. Thanks, bro! I’ll be munching on this for a while.

    Whole article would have been worth it just for these lines: “In my fourth age renewal, I came to a deep conviction that the fulcrum of Adventist theology, namely “God is Love,” is true. If it is true then all bets are off. If I can trust the heart of God, then I can wrestle boldly with Him when I don’t understand his actions, or am wounded by his people.” << GOLD.

    • abeccai
      September 11, 2013

      CS Lewis has a habit of making people munch after reading his material, glad it spoke to you.

  2. bellelessons
    September 11, 2013

    First of all your writing just blows me away. It’s kind of awesome:) Secondly,to be honest I don’t feel like our church does a great job of preaching the message that ‘God is Love’. I wholeheartedly believe this message, and I know there are imperfect people in the church, but I don’t know that a first time visitor would be able to walk away with that message from some of our churches. I agree with these stages very much and the author. I believe that when a child is raised in any religion, a decision has to be made as an adult to continue in that path, and that decision is usually based upon life experiences. I also agree with you, that as an Adventist I have had to accept that we are part of an imperfect church. I could have a lengthy discussion about this topic! My question to you is how do you plan on balancing teaching Eden about this God of love, versus some of our “rules” which come across as doctrines? For me, that is where the confusion and disenchantment began. We should have a FaceTime date about this lol.

    • abeccai
      September 11, 2013

      Thanks Toula, and your observations and comments are so good! Let me see if I can answer the one about teaching Eden the truth “God Is Love” and not “God is Rules.” I plan to do that in conjunction with Cass by modelling (however imperfectly) how God treats us. I will also try my best to educate her and one excellent source is called “The Jesus Storybook Bible” by Sally-Lloyd Jones. If you don’t have it already, then you have to get it. It is incredible. The book has a short prelude based on Psalm 19/Hebrews 1 and says the following “God wrote, “I love you” – he wrote it in the sky…out it into words, too, and wrote it in a book called the “the Bible.” Now, some people think the Bible is a book of rules, telling you what you should and shouldn’t do. The Bible certainly does have some rules in it. They show you how life works best. But the Bible isn’t mainly about you and what you should be doing. It’s about God and what he has done.”

      I will also teach Eden that there are four levels of beliefs within the SDA church. 1. Doctrines
      – fundamental beliefs like Jesus sacrificial death, Sabbath etc
      2. Teachings – lifestyle issues that are not a test of faith but church holds to be true like vegetarianism, religious liberty, conscientious objector status in military.
      3. Majority or Minority Views – positions held by larger groups of Adventist that are not formally recognised as doctrines or teachings like necessity of vegan lifestyle, law in Galatians, women not wearing pants
      4. Individual positions – views held by individuals or local church

      If Eden can understand these four levels of belief, she can navigate through a lot of things with less frustration and ignore people who try and raise their pet issues to the level of doctrine and make it a salvific issue.

      Finally I will have to pray a whole lot more than I currently am, because smarter more dedicated parents have gone before me and have lost their children to the enticements of the ‘far country.’

      • bellelessons
        September 11, 2013

        I like that. I really like that. I’ve never looked at it before, at the four levels of belief. Eden sure has a smart dad (and mommy too) 🙂 I’m going to look for that book for Iz. Thanks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on September 9, 2013 by in Uncategorized.
%d bloggers like this: